#Data Science Course Review

[bestdatasciencecourseindia]

🚀 VTU Goes All In on AI & ML Across All Streams!

🚀 AI for All: VTU Leads the Way in Engineering Education! 🧠💡

In a significant move to future-proof engineering education, Visvesvaraya Technological University (VTU) is expanding the scope of Artificial Intelligence (AI) and Machine Learning (ML) across all streams, including Civil and Mechanical Engineering!

Until now, AI/ML were offered only as electives in Computer Science — but VTU is changing the game. With rapid advancements in tech and industry demand for AI-skilled graduates, this visionary step ensures students across disciplines gain critical exposure to emerging technologies.

📌 Key Highlights: ✅ AI & ML now available to all engineering branches ✅ Optional degree program for interested students ✅ Faculty training & curriculum support already underway ✅ Strong industry relevance & growing demand for AI professionals

💬 As Professor Karisidappa, Vice-Chancellor of VTU, puts it: "AI has great scope and has already pushed boundaries in many fields..."

🔗 Read the full story: https://analyticsjobs.in/introducing-ai-in-all-streams-visvesvaraya-technology-university/

#ArtificialIntelligence #MachineLearning #EngineeringEducation #EdTech #VTU #HigherEducation #AIinEducation #AnalyticsJobs #FutureOfWork #STEM

[rajgupta007]

:

🚀 Thinking about enrolling in UpGrad's Data Science course?

Richa Dimri recently visited AnalyticsJobs.in — India’s only dedicated platform for authentic course reviews — and shared her experience with the UpGrad Data Science Program.

Whether you're considering this course or comparing it with other edtech offerings, real student reviews like Richa’s can give you the clarity you need. 📊

💬 Want to know if it's truly worth your investment?

✅ Read Richa’s review ✅ Explore honest feedback from other learners ✅ Share your own experience and help the next learner make an informed decision

👉 Dive into the discussion here:🔗 https://analyticsjobs.in/question/is-a-data-science-course-from-upgrad-worth-it/

Your next big career move starts with the right information.

#DataScience #EdTechReviews #UpGrad #AnalyticsJobs #CareerInDataScience #DataScienceCourse #StudentVoices #CourseReviews #EdTechIndia #UpSkilling #LinkedInLearners #HonestOpinions #FutureOfLearning

[rohit-69]

Internet Academy Reviews – Career Tracks, Courses, Learning Mode, Fee, Reviews, Ratings and Feedback

[lastfry]

Skillenable Reviews – Career Tracks, Courses, Learning Mode, Fee, Reviews, Ratings and Feedback

Introduction

SkillEnable's Data Science with Chat GPT Course has gained immense popularity for its comprehensive curriculum and practical approach, earning acclaim in SkillEnable Reviews. In the following sections, we will conduct a detailed analysis of the program, exploring its curriculum, teaching methodology, and outcomes. This examination aims to provide prospective students with valuable insights for informed educational decisions, catering to both seasoned professionals and recent graduates aspiring to thrive in the competitive field of data science.

Understanding SkillEnable Review:

SkillEnable, through skill development and financial support, endeavors to empower the youth in India, making them job-ready. Founded in 2019 by Nirpeksh Kumbhat, SkillEnable bridges the gap between traditional education and industry demands, offering quality education without the burden of high costs. The platform collaborates with educational institutions like IEM BCA, Kolkata, to provide specialized training in data science tools.

Founder and Executive Officer

Nirpeksh Kumbhat, with a background in M.Sc. Finance from The London School of Economics and a B.Sc. Finance degree from the University of Warwick, is the visionary founder of SkillEnable. He envisioned a platform to enable a better tomorrow for Indian youth by providing affordable and skill-focused education.

Partnerships and Collaborations

SkillEnable has partnered with IEM BCA, Kolkata, to educate engineering students about data science tools. This collaboration aims to upskill students in the booming field of data science, aligning educational content with industry requirements. Such initiatives mark a positive shift in the Indian education system, preparing students for practical challenges in their careers.

Key Strategies Implied to Flourish

SkillEnable's success is attributed to key strategies highlighted in SkillEnable Reviews. The platform emphasizes up-skilling through comprehensive training programs, showcasing commitment to empowering professionals. Strategic partnerships, as seen in collaborations with educational institutions, contribute to the platform's success. The SkillEnable initiative stands out for its transformative impact on professional growth.

Exclusive Interview with Nirpeksh Kumbhat, CEO of SkillEnable

An exclusive interview with Nirpeksh Kumbhat sheds light on SkillEnable's mission, vision, and approach to up-skilling. The interview underscores SkillEnable's dedication to delivering high-quality training experiences tailored to evolving learner needs. Through innovative teaching methodologies and strategic partnerships, SkillEnable remains a leader in driving professional development.

Outstanding Placements and Success Stories

SkillEnable's commitment to excellence is evident in its track record of outstanding placements for program graduates. Practical learning, industry-relevant projects, and personalized support contribute to successful career transitions, solidifying SkillEnable's reputation as a leading up-skilling platform.

Detailed Analysis on Accessibility of SkillEnable Website

SkillEnable's website design and navigation are analyzed for user-friendliness. The homepage, category sections, and responsive design ensure a seamless experience. The website incorporates an intuitive menu, robust search functionality, and features promoting accessibility. Course pages are well-structured, simplifying the enrollment process and providing tools for progress tracking.

Courses Offered on SkillEnable

SkillEnable offers a range of courses, including Data Science with Chat GPT, Full Stack Web Development, Front-End Development, Data Analytics with Chat GPT, Business Analytics with Chat GPT, Python, AI, ML, DL with Chat GPT, EV Design & Integration, Advanced Excel with Chat GPT, Power BI with Chat GPT, and Tableau with Chat GPT. Each course is designed to enhance skills in various domains.

SkillEnable Data Science with Chat GPT Program

The Data Science with Chat GPT Program is highlighted, featuring key aspects such as machine learning, deep learning, and data analysis. The program includes a six-month intensive course with career-oriented sessions, resume and LinkedIn profile building, mock interviews, 1:1 career mentoring, placement assistance, and exclusive job access. Eligibility criteria, curriculum, and the program's cost are detailed.

SkillEnable Masters ICT in Data Science: A Preview

SkillEnable's Masters ICT in Data Science program is previewed, emphasizing a comprehensive curriculum covering machine learning, deep learning, and data analysis. The program offers a six-month intensive course with career-oriented sessions, resume assistance, mock interviews, and placement support. The mentorship team, including Nihar Ranjan Roy and Mukesh Poddar, is introduced.

Pros and Cons of SkillEnable

SkillEnable's pros and cons are outlined based on reviews. Pros include a dynamic platform offering a variety of courses, cost EMI options, and collaborative initiatives. Cons involve the absence of FAQs on the website, high-cost courses, and limited information about mentors.

SkillEnable Reviews: Analytics Jobs

Reviews highlight concerns raised by customers, indicating issues related to the details and terms outlined in agreements. Some customers express dissatisfaction, labeling SkillEnable as a deceptive institution.

Conclusion

In conclusion, SkillEnable emerges as a premier platform dedicated to empowering individuals with the skills essential for success in data science. The positive impact reflected in SkillEnable Reviews affirms its effectiveness and reliability. The platform's commitment to excellence, innovative teaching methodologies, and strategic partnerships contribute to its significant influence on the careers of aspiring data scientists worldwide.

SkillEnable's Data Science with Chat GPT Program, with its comprehensive curriculum and career-focused approach, stands as a testament to the platform's commitment to transforming education. Whether for upskilling, career transition, or skill enhancement, SkillEnable remains a trusted partner for success in the dynamic field of data science.

[rahulswriteups]

Simplilearn Data Science Course: A Comprehensive Review

Aspiring professionals seeking to enroll in Simplilearn's data science course are often confronted with a multitude of choices and considerations. In this comprehensive review, we aim to provide honest insights into Simplilearn's data science program, aiding prospective learners in making informed decisions.

Simplilearn, an online learning platform, offers a diverse array of professional certification courses encompassing fields such as digital marketing, project management, cloud computing, cybersecurity, and notably, data science. Our primary objective is to collate genuine reviews from past and present learners who have undergone Simplilearn's data science course, thereby facilitating a transparent assessment for potential learners.

Introduction to Simplilearn: Simplilearn has swiftly emerged as a prominent e-learning platform, boasting collaborative courses from esteemed institutions like IIT Kanpur. Whether you're a novice or an experienced professional, Simplilearn endeavors to cater to your upskilling needs. From its inception in 2009 by Indian engineer Krishna Kumar, Simplilearn has evolved into a global entity with offices in Raleigh, North Carolina, and Bangalore, India.

Course Offerings and Curriculum: Simplilearn's data science curriculum encompasses a wide spectrum of topics, ranging from essential Python programming to advanced machine learning algorithms. Courses are meticulously designed to align with industry trends, ensuring relevance and applicability. Notable offerings include:

Data Science with Python

Data Science with R

Data Science Bootcamp

Post-Graduate Program in Data Science

Data Science Certification Training

Advanced Certification in Data Science and Machine Learning

Unique Features of Simplilearn: Simplilearn distinguishes itself through several key features:

Comprehensive Course Catalog: Simplilearn offers a vast array of courses across various domains, providing learners with ample choices.

Industry-Relevant Curriculum: Courses are crafted to reflect current industry demands, ensuring practical relevance.

Flexible Learning Opportunities: Learners can opt for mentorship-led virtual classrooms or self-paced learning, offering flexibility in learning.

Hands-On Projects and Lab: Practical experience is emphasized through case studies, projects, and lab exercises, enhancing skill acquisition.

Experienced Instructors: Courses are delivered by seasoned instructors with extensive industry knowledge, ensuring high-quality instruction.

Career Assistance: Simplilearn provides career support services, including resume building and interview preparation, enhancing employability.

Global Reach and Community Assistance: Simplilearn's global recognition facilitates networking opportunities through online communities and discussion forums.

24/7 Support: Active platform support ensures timely resolution of technical and course-related queries.

Fee Structure and Enrollment Process: The fee for Simplilearn's Data Science Job Guarantee certification program is ₹198,004 (inclusive of GST), with installment payment options available for convenience. Eligibility criteria include a bachelor's degree with a minimum of 50% marks, basic programming understanding, and 2+ years of work experience.

Pros and Cons: Pros:

In-depth course offerings.

24/7 support and community assistance.

Diverse courses with mentorship.

Job guidance and guarantees for select courses.

Cons:

Lengthy course categorization.

Selective smart chat feature.

Non-pocket-friendly fees.

Limited availability of job guarantee across courses.

Reviews from Various Platforms: Reviews from CourseReport and Trustpilot highlight both positive and negative experiences, emphasizing Simplilearn's strengths and areas for improvement. While some learners commend Simplilearn's offerings and support, others express dissatisfaction with certain aspects of the learning experience.

Conclusion: In conclusion, Simplilearn emerges as a robust platform offering comprehensive data science courses with a focus on practical relevance and industry alignment. Despite some drawbacks, Simplilearn's commitment to providing quality education and career support makes it a viable option for professionals seeking certification and career advancement in the field of data science.

If you want to learn more about this, click here - AnalyticsJobs

[analyticsjobss]

✨ Navigating the Upskilling Universe: Simplilearn vs. UpGrad & The Analytics Jobs Advantage ✨

Embarking on a journey of professional growth demands the right guide. Simplilearn shines as a beacon for those eager to climb career ladders, especially in India and the USA, offering courses that sync perfectly with industry needs. Yet, in our quest for knowledge, it's vital to explore the full spectrum of learning avenues, including the comprehensive educational offerings from UpGrad.

🚀 Simplilearn distinguishes itself with a suite of flexible, skill-focused programs, ranging from data science to digital marketing, tailored for professionals seeking swift career progression. In contrast, UpGrad broadens the horizon with its extensive educational pathways, including degree programs, appealing to those in search of a rounded academic experience.

📈 In this diverse educational landscape, Analytics Jobs shines as a beacon, offering community-powered reviews and insights. This platform highlights courses and trends that matter, especially in sought-after fields like analytics, ensuring your educational investments pave the way to your career aspirations.

💡 Whether your preference leans towards Simplilearn’s concise, skill-specific training or UpGrad’s comprehensive educational offerings, the end goal is universal: enhancing your professional trajectory. Let’s harness the power of these platforms to unlock endless possibilities in our careers and jobs.

#Upskilling #CareerAdvancement #LifelongLearning #Simplilearn #UpGrad #AnalyticsJobs #ProfessionalGrowth #FutureOfWork #ChooseWisely

[batmanisagatewaydrug]

i have asked this before on a different page and i CANNOT get an answer but can someone pls explain how porn addiction isn’t real??

like we had someone during sex ed in school bring it up as a topic and explain that (primarily a penis haver) you can train your brain to only be able to get hard/cum to porn and not be able to with a real person… and like sex addiction is real? but porn addiction is not? r there people just using “porn addiction” as a reason to ban porn all together and demonize it? like is that why?

i’m sorry if this comes across ignorant in any way. i am genuinely asking and open minded about this. if u take the time to answer thank you!! 🙏🏻

hi anon,

so it's actually helpful, and interesting, that you mention sex addiction, because that's also on pretty shaky ground as an actual thing that can be meaningfully diagnosed. which isn't to say that no one in the world exhibits maladaptive sexual behaviors, of course, but whether those behaviors can be accurately characterized as addictions is actively debated. in many cases what's casually described as "sex addiction" (which includes the use of pornography) would more accurately be classified as compulsive sexual behavior disorder, or CSBD, which has much more in common with obsessive compulsive disorder than addiction. to my knowledge, CSBD is rarely treated as a primary diagnoses, but rather part of a larger pattern of compulsive behavioral issues.

put this way: in many cases, saying that someone is a "sex addict" is sort of like saying someone with OCD is "addicted to washing their hands," in that it's misrepresenting a symptom as the primary issue and misunderstanding the cause of the behavior to boot.

now, talking about CSBD gives us a great segue into something that I think is really important when discussing the validity of porn addiction, which I'll lead into with this quote:

In their study, Grubbs, et al., analyzed data from about 15 different studies by varied researchers (and reviewed many more), comprising nearly 7,000 different participants. Studies were conducted in-person and online, in the United States and Europe. The team found that, first, religiousness was a strong, clear predictor of moral incongruence regarding porn use. This is important, as it indicates that we can and should use a person’s religiousness as an indicator of the likelihood of moral conflict over porn use. Not all people who are morally opposed to porn are religious, but it appears that religiosity captures the majority of people who feel this way. Given that the WHO and ICD-11 recommend an exclusion of moral conflict over sex from the diagnosis of Compulsive Sexual Behavior Disorder, this finding suggests that when diagnosing CSBD, a person’s religiousness is a critically important factor.

put more simply: high levels of religious guilt contribute to so much self-reported "porn addiction" that it can make it hard to figure out who's experiencing actual, verifiable compulsive behavioral issues.

this quote comes from an article called "Science Stopped Believing In Porn Addiction. You Should, Too," in which the author argues that porn addiction is essentially an outmoded understanding of problematic consumption of pornography that's failing to take into account other factors, in this case the moral incongruence or sense of conflict that many people feel about viewing pornography that causes them to feel shameful, dirty, or "out of control" when the use it. it can be read here:

porn addiction is problematic as a classification for other reasons as well; Dr. Devon price elaborates very neatly on many of them here:

again, I don't point out any of this to argue that no one ever has a relationship to sex or pornography that's detrimental to them and their ability to function, only that branding that as addiction is a.) inaccurate b.) unhelpful and c.) deeply loaded in a culture that so often stigmatizes addiction as a matter of weakness and poor character rather than recognizing it for what it actually is. many people grow up in a cultural context that profoundly stigmatizes sexuality, which makes a lot of people worry that they're aberrant and dangerous for doing anything that brings them sexual pleasure. trust me, my own inbox is a testament to that; I spend an enormous amount of time reassuring people that they're allowed to partake in utterly benign sexual behavior.

your example of people training themselves to only get off with porn is actually a great example here. the simple truth is that it's possible for people to train themselves into all kinds of sexual behaviors whether porn is involved or not, because if you only get off one way then your brain and body will simply learn to associate that particular type of stimuli with sexual pleasure and have a more difficult time with anything else.

people with clits who have spent a lot of time getting off by putting a vibrator smack on their clitoris benefit hugely from taking breaks and varying their masturbation style, especially since human partners are rarely able to provide the same type of stimuli as a toy. folks who are accustomed to only getting off in one position, whether it's on their back or humping a pillow or whatever else, can struggle with orgasming in other other position. people who have spent years masturbating before having partnered sex for the first time often find that it's a difficult adjustment—and I can attest to that one personally, because I had trouble for YEARS finishing with partners and almost always had to touch myself to make it happen. you can't even accuse porn of being responsible for that, because I've never particularly enjoyed watching porn and can probably count on one hand the number of times I've used it to get off.

to your final question about whether people are just claiming the existence of porn addiction as a reason to ban it—absolutely yes, many are. if you dig a little beneath the surface you'll find very quickly that many of the most vocal and well-funded anti-porn groups are run by deeply conservative religious groups and other far right wingnuts who stand to benefit tremendously if they can a.) ban porn and then b.) define "porn" as "anything that includes any kind of depiction of sexuality that I personally think is yucky." you see this deployed frequently with challenges to books in schools and libraries and subsequent book banning, which frequently target books about sex education, books featuring information about sexual abuse, and LGBTQ+ books of all stripes as "pornographic."

tl;dr I'm certainly not arguing that nobody on earth has a bad relationship with porn, but I do think the words we use to talk about that are important and porn addiction is a largely unhelpful way to do so.

[develeran]

Data Science Course in Thane - Develearn

Join Develearn's Data Science Course in Thane for comprehensive, hands-on training in the field of data science. Master data analysis, machine learning, and more in the heart of Thane.

[nasa]

Of course Saturn brought its ring light.

On June 25, 2023, our James Webb Space Telescope made its first near-infrared observations of Saturn. The planet itself appears extremely dark at this infrared wavelength, since methane gas absorbs almost all the sunlight falling on the atmosphere. The icy rings, however, stay relatively bright, leading to Saturn’s unusual appearance in this image.

This new image of Saturn clearly shows details within the planet’s ring system, several of the planet’s moons (Dione, Enceladus, and Tethys), and even Saturn’s atmosphere in surprising and unexpected detail.

These observations from Webb are just a hint at what this observatory will add to Saturn’s story in the coming years as the science team delves deep into the data to prepare peer-reviewed results.

Download the full-resolution image, both labeled and unlabeled, from the Space Telescope Science Institute.

Make sure to follow us on Tumblr for your regular dose of space!

[bestdatasciencecourseindia]

🚀🔥 Start-up Expo 4: The Ultimate Funding Festival is Here! 🔥🚀

🚀 Calling all entrepreneurs and start-ups! India’s biggest celebration of innovation and entrepreneurship is back — Start-up Expo 4 is set to take place on 28th September at Epicenter, Gurugram!

Co-created by Lufthansa and TiE Delhi-NCR, this free-to-attend event is a powerhouse of opportunity for start-ups: ✅ Connect with 100+ investors ✅ Attend knowledge sessions with industry leaders ✅ Get one-on-one mentoring ✅ Explore funding, partnerships, and customer acquisition avenues

The Start-up Expo 4 is more than just an event — it’s a Funding Festival where bold ideas meet big opportunities.

🎤 Don’t miss the insights from leaders like:

Rajan Anandan, President, TiE Delhi-NCR

George Ettiyil, Senior Director Sales, Lufthansa

Geetika Dayal, Executive Director, TiE Delhi-NCR

💡 And here’s the best part — the winning start-up gets: • Fast-track access to investors • Entry into Cambridge Ignite entrepreneurship program • Lufthansa Business Class ticket to Europe • 6-month mentorship & TiE Club membership

👉 Read the full blog and register now: 🔗 https://analyticsjobs.in/funding-festival-start-up-expo-4-to-be-held-on-28th-september

#StartupExpo4 #AnalyticsJobs #Startups #Entrepreneurship #FundingOpportunities #TiEDelhiNCR #Lufthansa #IndiaStartups #Networking #BusinessGrowth #StartupIndia

[rohit-69]

Internet Academy Reviews for Career Tracks, Courses, Learning Mode, Fee, Ratings and Feedback

Introduction

In the ever-evolving landscape of web development and design, Internet Academy stands as a beacon of knowledge and professional advancement. Founded in 1995 in Tokyo, this trailblazing institution has grown into a global powerhouse, offering a diverse array of courses tailored to equip students with practical skills and leading-edge expertise in the digital domain.

About the Company

According to Internet Academy reviews, Internet Academy holds the distinction of being Japan’s premier professional web institute, with a storied history of innovation and excellence. With branches in major IT hubs worldwide, the academy prides itself on delivering a curriculum that is both globally relevant and continually updated to reflect the latest technological advancements. As a proud member of the W3C, Internet Academy ensures that its students learn from a curriculum that positions them at the forefront of global competition.

Related : Analytics Jobs

Mission & Vision

The mission of Internet Academy is to bridge the gap between theoretical knowledge and practical application. By offering hands-on experience and a robust foundation in web technologies, the academy aims to empower its students to thrive in the fast-paced digital landscape. Its vision is to cultivate a global network of skilled professionals who not only excel in navigating the web industry but also play a pivotal role in shaping its future.

Pros

Practical Skills Focus: With a strong emphasis on practical skills, students engage in real-world projects, ensuring they are well-prepared for employment upon course completion.

Global Curriculum: Internet Academy’s curriculum is designed to be globally applicable, positioning students advantageously in the international job market by adhering to the forefront of web standards.

Career Support: The academy offers comprehensive career support, with dedicated career counselors assisting students in feeling confident and prepared for job interviews.

Satisfied Graduates: Over 25,000 graduates have benefited from the academy’s courses, many of whom have achieved significant success in their careers.

Cons

Limited Course Offerings: Some reviews suggest that there could be a broader range of classes to cater to a wider array of interests and skill sets.

Financial Investment: Students may need to invest in technology and internet services to fully benefit from the online learning environment.

Geographic Limitations: While the academy has a global presence, some prospective students may find it challenging to access physical premises or prefer more localized content.

Conclusion

Internet Academy has cemented its position as a leader in web design and development education. Its commitment to practical skills, a world-class curriculum, and comprehensive career support underscores its dedication to nurturing a new generation of web professionals. While there are areas for improvement, such as expanding course offerings and addressing financial barriers for students, the academy’s global impact and the success of its graduates speak volumes about its quality and relevance in today’s digital landscape. In essence, Internet Academy transcends being merely an educational institution; it serves as a gateway to the future of the web industry, fostering talent and innovation one student at a time.

[rwac96]

Science, The Greatest Weapon (Sonic x Transformers Crossover)

"Can you hear me?" Doctor Ivo Robotnik says to the specimen, sporting an eerie, wide grin. "I know you can hear me. You're not my first UFO, and from what I discovered from your amazing mind, you certainly won't be the last."

The rotund, mustached scientist cackled as he sat in his chair, his gaze focused on the subject before him. Ivo was a roboticist; he presented it well through his creations, even if the people reviled them. Even if they're destroyed by that accursed blue hedgehog. Robotnik stroked his greying, auburn mustache, chuckling lowly. Not too long ago, after the Star Fall Isles incident, one of his Badniks alerted him to an intriguing discovery in the outskirts of Holoska. Using a squadron of Badniks, led by Metal Sonic, he had the specimen teleported to one of the undiscovered bunkers he had on Earth. For weeks, he had attempted to get his discovery to share what he knew, but he refused. Robotnik was met with threats of violence and vows to 'burn down this miserable mudball'. From his past experiences with aliens, they prove to have no manners.

"During each of our sessions, you proved to be quite the unruly and volatile subject," Ivo says, separating his gloved hands from one another, reaching for one of the square buttons on his red & white coat.

"I was trying to be polite. After all, it's not every day that my Badniks discover a true Living Machine. After every session, I reviewed my findings and compared them to my technology. I must admit, from the scattered bits of data I got from your head, your people are more advanced than I. I am quite thankful I found a fun way to rip out those secrets from your soul."

With the press of a button, Robotnik's specimen yelled in complete pain and agony as volts of electricity coursed through its very being. One of its red eyes widened, its mouth opening, revealing teeth. The prisoner jolted upward as the obese doctor cackled with glee. Then, Ivo moves his finger from the button, shutting down the electricity, causing the subject to hang its head low once more.

"Your sacrifice has shown me there are other energy signatures that have arrived on Earth," Robotnik said with glee, turning his chair to the images on his monitors: robotic warriors battling each other. "Similar to yours. My Badniks will track them down, and I will learn about this energy that fuels you."

Ivo rises from his seat, approaches his computer, and retrieves a small, glowing, cyan cube. The mustached terrorist picks up the substance, placing it in a lead-lined suitcase. "It doesn't merely power technology," Robotnik observes, gazing down at the cube with wonder, his brilliant and twisted mind thinking of means to wield this 'Energon'. "It transforms it."

"I am on the verge of unlocking its secrets." Ivo closed the suitcase, shifting his gaze back to the subject, "When I successfully do, I will use it on my machines, elevating them to grand heights." He laughed, lifting up the suitcase and turning away from his prisoner.

"I must thank you, Specimen," Robotnik said, beginning his trek toward the large double doors. "With your sacrifice, the Eggman Empire will be unstoppable. I will lead a new and more powerful takeover, and no force on Earth, or any other world," he turns one last time to the armless subject, "will be able to stop me." He turns his head back to his path and resumes walking. "Not even that annoying blue rodent Sonic will be able to stand against me this time."

Doctor Ivo "Eggman" Robotnik cackled loudly as he exited the large lab, planning to use this new energy source to fuel his army, to take over the world once more, and to kill his sworn enemy, Sonic the Hedgehog.

---

As the large doors shut, Megatron stayed silent, even after what felt like the twentieth or twenty-first electric shock he had endured from this Robotnik insect. Even as the obese cretin dug around his mind with his primitive drones, his thoughts were occupied with revenge. Revenge against Optimus Prime, revenge against the traitorous Starscream whose assassination attempt had led him to land on this rock and held prisoner. He thought of vengeance against the mustache fool who sought to use their precious Energon in his grandeur of delusion. From the latest 'conversation' Megatron endured with the power-hungry wretch, it seemed more Cybertronians had arrived here, most likely his warriors- and his hated enemies. It seems his imprisonment will not last forever, should his more loyal soldiers find him or he finds one slip up in the fool's defenses.

"Starscream," Megatron said with hatred, "Optimus Prime, Robotnik, I shall be avenged."

Megatron's memory processor, though violated by the rotund lunatic, was flooded with flashes of the previous battle before his current predicament. Leading his Decepticons on an assault upon the Human-Made Collider, the hated Autobots arriving and battling to defend the fleshlings, he and Optimus colliding again, and he close to snuffing out Prime's spark once and for all. But, that damnable Energon Axe, he chopped off his fusion cannon arm, kicking him towards the portal, which grew unstable. Before the flash of light, he saw the duplicitous Starscream, aiming his null ray cannon at his face.

When he gets free of this prison, retribution shall come to them all. Starscream, the traitor, will be severely and brutally punished. Robotnik, the fleshing who held him prisoner, he will personally see to his death. Lastly, Optimus Prime, Megatron will slay his precious Autobots and then cut down his hated enemy.

"I shall rise again."

[rahulswriteups]

Simplilearn Reviews

Introduction:

In the ever-evolving landscape of online education, Simplilearn has emerged as a prominent player, offering a variety of courses to individuals seeking to upskill or pivot their careers. With the plethora of online learning platforms available, it's essential to separate the hype from reality. In this blog post, we'll delve into Simplilearn reviews to uncover the real truth behind its reputation.

Course Content and Quality:

Simplilearn offers a wide array of courses spanning various domains such as data science, digital marketing, project management, and more. Reviews often highlight the relevance and depth of the course content. Many learners appreciate the real-world applicability of the skills acquired through Simplilearn courses, with hands-on projects and case studies being a standout feature. The inclusion of industry-relevant certifications adds further credibility to the courses.

Expert Instructors:

The quality of instructors can make or break an online learning experience. Simplilearn boasts a roster of experienced industry professionals as instructors. Learners commend the expertise and practical insights that instructors bring to the courses. The inclusion of live sessions and Q&A sessions allows students to interact directly with experts, enhancing the overall learning experience.

Flexibility and Accessibility:

Flexibility is a key advantage of online learning, and Simplilearn understands the importance of accommodating diverse learner needs. Reviews frequently highlight the flexibility in scheduling, enabling individuals with busy lifestyles to pursue their educational goals. Additionally, the accessibility of course materials even after course completion ensures that learners can revisit and reinforce their knowledge whenever necessary.

Community and Support:

Simplilearn fosters a sense of community among its learners through forums and discussion boards. Reviews often emphasize the supportiveness of the community, with students exchanging insights, tips, and advice. The availability of customer support is another positive aspect, ensuring that learners can seek assistance promptly if faced with any issues during their learning journey.

Conclusion:

While no learning platform is without its flaws, Simplilearn has managed to establish a positive reputation based on its commitment to providing quality education with a focus on practical skills. The real truth behind Simplilearn reviews lies in the consistently positive feedback regarding user experience, course content, expert instructors, flexibility, and community support. As with any educational investment, it's crucial for individuals to assess their specific needs and goals before embarking on their learning journey with Simplilearn.

To Know more about Simplilearn, Click Here: Simplilearn Review

[analyticsjobss]

UpGrad Data Science Course Reviews: An In-Depth Analysis by Analytics Jobs

In the rapidly evolving field of data science, choosing the right educational course can be a daunting task. This is where Analytics Jobs steps in, offering a guiding hand to those embarking on their data science journey. Our mission at Analytics Jobs is to provide learners with accurate, comprehensive information, enabling them to make well-informed decisions about their education and career paths. One of the key ways we achieve this is through our detailed reviews of data science courses, with a particular focus on UpGrad's offerings.

Understanding the importance of reliable feedback, we at Analytics Jobs have embarked on an initiative to gather authentic reviews of UpGrad’s Data Science course. These reviews are sourced from both current and former learners, ensuring a balanced and honest perspective. The rationale behind this effort is simple yet profound – quality feedback is essential in gauging the true value of any educational program. We encourage candid reviews, as honest feedback is instrumental in helping prospective students understand the real impact and effectiveness of the course.

To augment the user reviews, our team has conducted a comprehensive review of the UpGrad Data Science program. This includes a meticulous examination of various facets of the program, ensuring that our readers receive a well-rounded view. Our blog and official YouTube channel are the platforms where this rich content is shared. These platforms feature in-depth videos that delve into the nitty-gritty of the course, covering aspects like the curriculum structure, faculty profiles, job assistance, and more. These videos are not just overviews but are detailed explorations intended to give viewers a deep understanding of what the program entails.

The curriculum review looks into how well the course content aligns with current industry standards and practices. It’s crucial for a data science program to be up-to-date given the rapid pace of technological advancement in the field. Our review thus assesses the relevance and comprehensiveness of the course material.

Another critical aspect we cover is the profile of the faculty. The quality of teaching is paramount in any learning experience, more so in a field as complex and dynamic as data science. Our review therefore scrutinizes the qualifications, industry experience, and teaching prowess of the instructors involved in the UpGrad course.

Job assistance is a significant concern for many learners. Our review therefore examines the effectiveness of UpGrad's career support services. This includes looking at the networking opportunities, internship placements, and the overall success rate of students in securing relevant job roles post-completion of the course.

We encourage prospective learners to view these videos before submitting their own feedback on the course. This ensures that the reviews we collect are well-informed and add value to our collective understanding of the program's efficacy.

In conclusion, our in-depth review process at Analytics Jobs, complemented by real learner feedback, provides a comprehensive picture of UpGrad's Data Science course. This approach helps us achieve our goal of assisting learners in making informed decisions that will shape their future in the field of data science. Whether you're a prospective student or a curious onlooker, our resources are designed to give you a clear and honest insight into what you can expect from this educational journey.

[transmutationisms]

hello! im just finishing up my read of structures of scientific revolutions, which has genuinely been very useful and shifted my understanding of science in a way being around people doing scientific research all day really didn't! i don't have a liberal arts education so i would love to get a sense of (a) what else of the philosophy / history of science canon is worth reading in the original (b) standard review papers or introductory textbooks and (c) critiques of the canon. i understand this is a big ask ofc, so feel free to point me to good depts / syllabi from good courses. thanks :)

yessss such a fun question >:) so, the thing that was so great about 'the structure of scientific revolutions', which i'm sure you've picked up on, is that kuhn pushed historians and philosophers of science to challenge the positivist model of science as a linearly progressive search to 'accumulate knowledge'. the idea of a 'paradigm shift' was itself a paradigm shift at the time; it was an early example of a language for talking about radical change in science without giving into the assumption that change necessarily = 'progress' (defined by national interests, mathematisation, and so forth). this is still an approach that's foundational to history and philosophy of science; it's now taken as so axiomatic that few academics even bother to gloss or defend it in monographs (which raises its own issue with public communication, lol).

where kuhn falls apart more (and this was typical for a philosopher of his era, training, and academic milieu) is in the fact that he never developed any kind of rigorous sociological analysis of science (despite alluding to such a thing being necessary) and you probably also noticed that he makes a few major leaps that indicate he's not fully committed to thinking through the relationship between science and politics. so for example, we might ask, can a paradigm shift ever occur for a reason other than a discovered 'anomaly' that the previous paradigm can't account for? for instance, how do political investments in science and scientific theories affect what's accepted as 'normal science' in a kuhnian sense? are there historical or present cases where a paradigm didn't change even though it persistently failed to explain certain empirical observations or data? what about the opposite, where a paradigm did change, but it wasn't necessarily or exclusively because the new paradigm was a 'better' explanation scientifically? how do we determine what makes an explanation 'better', anyway, especially given that kuhn himself was very much invested in moving beyond the naïve realist position? and on the more sociological side, we can raise issues like: say you're a scientist and you legitimately have discovered an 'anomaly'. how do you communicate that to other scientists? what mechanisms of knowledge production and publication enable you to circulate that information and to be taken seriously? what modes of communication must you use and what credentials or interpersonal connections must you have? what factors cause theories and discoveries to be taken more or less seriously, or adopted more or less quickly, besides just their 'scientific utility' (again, assuming we can even define such a thing)?

again, this is not to shit on kuhn, but to point out that both history and philosophy of science have had a lot of avenues to explore since his work. note that there are a few major disciplinary distinctions here, each with many sub-schools of thought. a 'science and technology studies' or STS program tends to be a mix of sociological and philosophical analysis of science, often with an emphasis on 'technoscience' and much less on historical analysis. a philosophy of science department will be anchored more firmly in the philosophical approach, so you'll find a lot of methodological critique, and a lot of scholarship that seeks to tackle current aporias in science using various philosophical frameworks. a history of science program is fundamentally just a sub-discipline of history, and scholarship in this area asks about the development of science over time, how various forms of thinking came into and out of favour, and so forth. often a department will do both history and philosophy of science (HPS). historians of medicine, technology, and mathematics will sometimes (for arcane scholastic reasons varying by field, training, and country) be anchored in departments of medicine / technology / mathematics, rather than with other faculty of histsci / HPS. but, increasingly in the anglosphere you'll see departments that cover history of science, technology, and mathematics (HSTM) together. obviously, all of these distinctions say more about professional qualifications and university bureaucracy than they do about the actual subject matter; in actuality, a good history of science should virtually always include attention to some philosophical and sociological dimensions, and vice versa.

anyway—reading recs:

there are two general reference texts i would recommend here if you just want to get some compilations of major / 'canonical' works in this field. both are edited volumes, so you can skip around in them as much as you want. both are also very limited in focus to, again, a very particular 'western canon' defined largely by trends in anglo academia over the past half-century or so.

philosophy of science: the central issues (1998 [2013], ed. martin curd & j. a. cover). this is an anthology of older readings in philsci. it's a good introduction to many of the methodological questions and problems that the field has grown around; most of these readings have little to no historical grounding and aren't pretending otherwise.

the cambridge history of science (8 vols., 2008–2020, gen. eds. david c. lindberg & ron numbers). no one reads this entire set because it's long as shit. however, each volume has its own temporal / topical focus, and the essays function as a crash-course in historical methodology in addition to whatever value you derive from the case studies in their own right. i like these vols much more than the curd & cover, but if you really want to dig into the philosophical issues and not the histories, curd & cover might be more fun.

besides those, here are some readings in histsci / philsci that i'd recommend if you're interested. for consistency i ordered these by publication date, but bolded a few i would recommend as actual starting points lol. again some of these focus on specific historical cases, but are also useful imo methodologically, regardless of how much you care about the specific topic being discussed.

Robert M. Young. 1969. "Malthus and the Evolutionists: The Common Context of Biological and Social Theory." Past & Present 43: 109–145.

David Bloor. 1976 [1991]. Knowledge and Social Imagery. Chicago: University of Chicago Press (here is a really useful extract that covers the main points of this text).

Ian Hacking. 1983. Representing and Intervening: Introductory Topics in the Philosophy of Natural Science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Steven Shapin. 1988. “Understanding the Merton Thesis.” Isis 79 (4): 594–605.

Steven Shapin and Simon Schaffer. 1989. Leviathan and the Air-Pump: Hobbes, Boyle, and the Experimental Life. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

Mario Biagioli. 1993. Galileo, Courtier: The Practice of Science in the Culture of Absolutism. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Bruno Latour. 1993. The Pasteurization of France. Translated by Alan Sheridan and John Law. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Margaret W. Rossiter. 1993. “The Matthew Matilda Effect in Science.” Social Studies of Science 23 (2): 325–41.

Andrew Pickering. 1995. The Mangle of Practice. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Porter, Theodore M. Trust in Numbers: The Pursuit of Objectivity in Science and Public Life. Princeton University Press, 1996.

Peter Galison. 1997. “Trading Zone: Coordinating Action and Belief.” In The Science Studies Reader, edited by Mario Biagioli, 137–60. New York: Routledge.

Crosbie Smith. 1998. The Science of Energy: A Cultural History of Energy Physics in Victorian Britain. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Chambers, David Wade, and Richard Gillespie. “Locality in the History of Science: Colonial Science, Technoscience, and Indigenous Knowledge.” Osiris 15 (2000): 221–40.

Kuriyama, Shigehisa. The Expressiveness of the Body and the Divergence of Greek and Chinese Medicine. Zone Books, 2002.

Timothy Mitchell. 2002. Rule of Experts: Egypt, Techno-Politics, Modernity. Berkeley: University of California Press.

James A. Secord. 2003. Victorian Sensation: The Extraordinary Publication, Reception, and Secret Authorship of Vestiges of the Natural History of Creation. Chicago: University Of Chicago Press.

Sheila Jasanoff. 2006. “Biotechnology and Empire: The Global Power of Seeds and Science.” Osiris 21 (1): 273–92.

Murphy, Michelle. Sick Building Syndrome and the Problem of Uncertainty: Environmental Politics, Technoscience, and Women Workers. Duke University Press, 2006.

Kapil Raj. 2007. Relocating Modern Science: Circulation and the Construction of Knowledge in South Asia and Europe, 1650–1900. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

Schiebinger, Londa L. Plants and Empire: Colonial Bioprospecting in the Atlantic World. Harvard University Press, 2007.

Galison, Peter. “Ten Problems in History and Philosophy of Science.” Isis 99, no. 1 (2008): 111–24.

Daston, Lorraine, and Peter Galison. Objectivity. Zone Books, 2010.

Dipesh Chakrabarty. 2011. “The Muddle of Modernity.” American Historical Review 116 (3): 663–75.

Forman, Paul. “On the Historical Forms of Knowledge Production and Curation: Modernity Entailed Disciplinarity, Postmodernity Entails Antidisciplinarity.” Osiris 27, no. 1 (2012): 56–97.

Ashworth, William J. 2014. "The British Industrial Revolution and the the Ideological Revolution: Science, Neoliberalism, and History." History of Science 52 (2): 178–199.

Mavhunga, Clapperton. 2014. Transient Workspaces: Technologies of Everyday Innovation in Zimbabwe. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Lynn Nyhart. 2016. “Historiography of the History of Science.” In A Companion to the History of Science, edited by Bernard Lightman, 7–22. Chichester, UK: Wiley Blackwell.

Rana Hogarth. 2017. Medicalizing Blackness: Making Racial Difference in the Atlantic World, 1780–1840. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.

Suman Seth. 2018. Difference and Disease: Medicine, Race, and the Eighteenth-Century British Empire. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

Aro Velmet. 2020. Pasteur's Empire: Bacteriology and Politics in France, its Colonies, and the World. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

i would also say, as a general rule, these books are generally all so well-known that there are very good book reviews and review essays on them, which you can find through jstor / your library's database. these can be invaluable both because your reading list would otherwise just mushroom out forever, and because a good review can help you decide whether you even need / want to sit down with the book itself in the first place. literally zero shame in reading an academic text secondhand via reviews.

[mariacallous]

WASHINGTON (AP) — The Justice Department on Thursday formally moved to reclassify marijuana as a less dangerous drug, a historic shift in generations of U.S. drug policy.

A proposed rule sent to the federal register recognizes the medical uses of cannabis and acknowledges it has less potential for abuse than some of the nation’s most dangerous drugs. The plan approved by Attorney General Merrick Garland would not legalize marijuana outright for recreational use.

The Drug Enforcement Administration will next take public comment on the proposal in a potentially lengthy process. If approved, the rule would move marijuana away from its current classification as a Schedule I drug, alongside heroin and LSD. Pot would instead be a Schedule III substance, alongside ketamine and some anabolic steroids.

The move comes after a recommendation from the federal Health and Human Services Department, which launched a review of the drug’s status at the urging of President Joe Biden in 2022.

Biden also has moved to pardon thousands of people convicted federally of simple possession of marijuana and has called on governors and local leaders to take similar steps to erase convictions.

“This is monumental,” Biden said in a video statement, calling it an important move toward reversing longstanding inequities. “Far too many lives have been upended because of a failed approach to marijuana, and I’m committed to righting those wrongs. You have my word on it.”

The election year announcement could help Biden, a Democrat, boost flagging support, particularly among younger voters.

The notice kicks off a 60-day comment period followed by a possible review from an administrative judge, which could be a drawn-out process.

Biden and a growing number of lawmakers from both major political parties have been pushing for the DEA decision as marijuana has become increasingly decriminalized and accepted, particularly by younger people. Some argue that rescheduling doesn’t go far enough and marijuana should instead be treated the way alcohol is.

Democratic Senate Majority Leader Sen. Chuck Schumer of New York applauded the change and called for additional steps toward legalization.

The U.S. Cannabis Council, a trade group, said the switch would “signal a tectonic shift away from the failed policies of the last 50 years.”

The Justice Department said that available data reviewed by HHS shows that while marijuana “is associated with a high prevalence of abuse,” that potential is more in line with other Schedule III substances, according to the proposed rule.

The HHS recommendations are binding until the draft rule is submitted, and Garland agreed with it for the purposes of starting the process.

Still, the DEA has not yet formed its own determination as to where marijuana should be scheduled, and it expects to learn more during the rulemaking process, the document states.

Some critics argue the DEA shouldn’t change course on marijuana, saying rescheduling isn’t necessary and could lead to harmful side effects.

Dr. Kevin Sabet, a former White House drug policy adviser now with the group Smart Approaches to Marijuana, said there isn’t enough data to support moving pot to Schedule III. “As we’ve maintained throughout this process, it’s become undeniable that politics, not science, is driving this decision and has been since the very beginning,” Sabet said.

The immediate effect of rescheduling on the nation’s criminal justice system is expected to be muted. Federal prosecutions for simple possession have been fairly rare in recent years.

Schedule III drugs are still controlled substances and subject to rules and regulations, and people who traffic in them without permission could still face federal criminal prosecution.

Federal drug policy has lagged behind many states in recent years, with 38 states having already legalized medical marijuana and 24 legalizing its recreational use. That’s helped fuel fast growth in the marijuana industry, with an estimated worth of nearly $30 billion.

Easing federal regulations could reduce the tax burden that can be 70% or more for marijuana businesses, according to industry groups. It also could make it easier to research marijuana, since it’s very difficult to conduct authorized clinical studies on Schedule I substances.